It appears Dana White has kept his word.
In November, the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) president said he was working to “loosen up” the rules when it comes to cannabis.
As of Jan. 1, MMA Fighting reports that positive cannabis tests no longer trigger fines and suspensions for UFC fighters.
The revised rules represent and agreement between the UFC and the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA).
At least five UFC fighters have been suspended over the previous 12 months for testing positive for cannabis.
In many cases, the fighters said that the positive tests were a result of residual cannabis being in their systems after taking fights on short notice.
“In a significant number of cases involving cannabinoids, we found that the THC presence was residual and provided no performance-enhancing benefit nor impairment at the levels found,” USADA UFC and Premier Sport senior manager Ryan Carpenter told MMA Fighting.
Under the new rules, fighters will still be tested for cannabinoids, but will not be punished for positive results unless “further evidence demonstrates the substance was taken for performance-enhancing purposes,”Newsday reports.
“The only concern that we have here with marijuana, it’s an in-competition prohibited drug only,” Jeff Novitzky, vice president of athlete health and performance for the UFC, told Newsday. “So you want to make sure the fighters aren’t impaired when they’re fighting. And the reality, and what the science shows with marijuana, is strictly a level in urine or blood really has no scientific correlation with impairments.”
Novitzky explained that a report prepared for the U.S. Department of Transportation, which found no consistency between levels of THC in an individual’s system and level of impairment, informed the UFC’s decision.
“What the science shows, there’s so many variables with your urine or blood levels of THC that there’s really no scientific correlation between that number and impairment,” Novitzky told MMA Fighting. “That’s really the only thing we care about in fighting from an anti-doping perspective is impairment.”
Novitzky told MMA Fighting that cannabis use could be considered “performance-enhancing” if the fighter shows obvious signs of impairment.
“We’re making the leap that if you’re under the influence, there is some performance-enhancing benefit there,” Novizky said. “The scenarios that I could think of would be a fighter shows up fight night in the locker room, they have bloodshot eyes, they smell like marijuana, they’re slurring or a far-off gaze. There’s evidence that they recently used marijuana, I think would qualify as the performance-enhancing factor because they’re actively impaired at a fight,” he said.
And though the revised rules are a step in the right direction, fighters will still be subjected to tests from local athletic commissions and could face punishment for positive results.
The Nevada State Athletic Commission, for example, has not hesitated to suspend, fine and overturn wins for fighters who have tested positive for cannabis, despite the plant being legal within the state.
“That’s where the issue continues to remain, the athletic commissions,” Novitzky said in October. “By sanctioning on marijuana, I really think we are pushing these athletes to drugs that are even more dangerous.”
The hope is that the athletic commissions will be open to reforming their rules and follow in the footsteps of the USADA and UFC.
Novitzky told MMA Fighting that those discussions are already underway. “We’ve started already with athletic commissions. Sharing this science with them,” he said, adding that he had already spoken with the executive director of California’s athletic commission, Andy Foster.
“They are already one of the most progressive commissions on how they handle marijuana,” Novitzky said. “I think they fine like US$100 for a positive marijuana test. They don’t sanction. They don’t overturn victories. So he was really interested and I think enthusiastic about what we’re doing.”